Davila v. Davis, No.16-6219

Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/04/argument-analysis-justices-seem-inclined-avoid-creating-enormous-hole-doctrine-procedural-default-nested-ineffective-assistance-case/davila-v-davis-no-16-6219/">Davila v. Davis, No.16-6219</a></blockquote>
<script type='text/javascript'>
<!--//--><![CDATA[//><!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(d,l){"use strict";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(d.addEventListener)e=!0;if(d.wp=d.wp||{},!d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){var r,a,i,s,n,o=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]');for(r=0;r<c.length;r++)c[r].style.display="none";for(r=0;r<o.length;r++)if(a=o[r],e.source===a.contentWindow){if(a.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3<(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i<200)i=200;a.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement("a"),n=l.createElement("a"),s.href=a.getAttribute("src"),n.href=t.value,n.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===a)d.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),d.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!o){o=!0;var e,t,r,a,i=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),s=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),n=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content");for(t=0;t<n.length;t++){if(!(r=n[t]).getAttribute("data-secret"))a=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),r.src+="#?secret="+a,r.setAttribute("data-secret",a);if(i||s)(e=r.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),r.parentNode.replaceChild(e,r)}}}}(window,document);
//--><!]]>
</script><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/04/argument-analysis-justices-seem-inclined-avoid-creating-enormous-hole-doctrine-procedural-default-nested-ineffective-assistance-case/davila-v-davis-no-16-6219/embed/" width="600" height="400" title="&#8220;Davila v. Davis, No.16-6219&#8221; &#8212; SCOTUSblog" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe>
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed