Argument analysis: Justices display disparate views on implied fraud under False Claims Act
About the only thing clarified by yesterday’s oral argument in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar is that the Court is unlikely to issue a unanimous opinion. The visceral reactions of the Justices on the merits of the case could hardly be more disparate. The case arises under the False Claims Act, … Continue reading Argument analysis: Justices display disparate views on implied fraud under False Claims Act
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed