The “full” method of measuring the Court’s review of decisions by the courts of appeals: October Term 2011
This blog occasionally publishes longer posts commenting on trends in the study of the Supreme Court. In this post, John S. Summers and Michael J. Newman – who are shareholder and associate, respectively, in the litigation department of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller – examine one common Supreme Court metric: circuit reversal rates. The … Continue reading The “full” method of measuring the Court’s review of decisions by the courts of appeals: October Term 2011
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed
The “full” method of measuring the Court’s review of decisions by the courts of appeals: October Term 2011
This blog occasionally publishes longer posts commenting on trends in the study of the Supreme Court. In this post, John S. Summers and Michael J. Newman – who are shareholder and associate, respectively, in the litigation department of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller – examine one common Supreme Court metric: circuit reversal rates. The … Continue reading The “full” method of measuring the Court’s review of decisions by the courts of appeals: October Term 2011