<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Important Precedents are Likely to Be in Jeopardy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry  Oklahoma</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/comment-page-1/#comment-7776</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry  Oklahoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/#comment-7776</guid>
		<description>The Court could be more conservative. effecting Roe V Wade, and also prayer in schools etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Court could be more conservative. effecting Roe V Wade, and also prayer in schools etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel P. Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/comment-page-1/#comment-7775</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel P. Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/#comment-7775</guid>
		<description>I am surprised that you did not include Lawrence v. Texas (02-102).  Do you think that that may be in jeopardy of being overturned ?

TG responds: not in the short term given Justice Kennedy&#039;s vote.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised that you did not include Lawrence v. Texas (02-102).  Do you think that that may be in jeopardy of being overturned ?</p>
<p>TG responds: not in the short term given Justice Kennedy&#8217;s vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/comment-page-1/#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 23:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/which-important-precedents-are-likely-to-be-in-jeopardy/#comment-7774</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Someone linked to this today and you already moved the article.  Impressive.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Someone linked to this today and you already moved the article.  Impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.446 seconds -->
