<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Comes After Ledbetter?  An Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AJ Plotke</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-14442</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Plotke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/#comment-14442</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that Plotke v. White is relevant, from the 10th Circuit.  I&#039;m a bit surprised that it is not being applied.
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Plotke v. White is relevant, from the 10th Circuit.  I&#8217;m a bit surprised that it is not being applied.<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendel Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11685</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendel Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/#comment-11685</guid>
		<description>Ledbetter was an easy case under Morgan.  Most, if not all, discrete employment actions will affect compensation in some way.  For example, a demotion would lower the employee&#039;s salary, but it still would be a discrete employment action in Morgan&#039;s taxonomy.  Bazemore made sense, too.  That it was difficult and decided merely 5-4 is a testament to the lack of a reasonably precise set of standards for evaluating these questions.

In the short term, Ledbetter will spawn only confusion.  First, courts will likely become more open to traditional equitable tolling of charge filing deadlines, which already serves as a discovery rule of sorts.  This is especially so given footnote 10.  Second, courts will likely continue to chip away at the exhaustion doctrine; the presumed difficulty of discovering the discriminatory motive will be the justification for these rulings.  Interestingly, at the same time as the courts extend the time for filing because charging parties allegedly need additional time, they will still apply the pleading rules that presume that the only way to investigate a claim is through discovery. The one question that I cannot answer is whether Ledbetter is an indication of things to come or is merely a reflection of a changing environment for employers.  It will be an interesting few years.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ledbetter was an easy case under Morgan.  Most, if not all, discrete employment actions will affect compensation in some way.  For example, a demotion would lower the employee&#8217;s salary, but it still would be a discrete employment action in Morgan&#8217;s taxonomy.  Bazemore made sense, too.  That it was difficult and decided merely 5-4 is a testament to the lack of a reasonably precise set of standards for evaluating these questions.</p>
<p>In the short term, Ledbetter will spawn only confusion.  First, courts will likely become more open to traditional equitable tolling of charge filing deadlines, which already serves as a discovery rule of sorts.  This is especially so given footnote 10.  Second, courts will likely continue to chip away at the exhaustion doctrine; the presumed difficulty of discovering the discriminatory motive will be the justification for these rulings.  Interestingly, at the same time as the courts extend the time for filing because charging parties allegedly need additional time, they will still apply the pleading rules that presume that the only way to investigate a claim is through discovery. The one question that I cannot answer is whether Ledbetter is an indication of things to come or is merely a reflection of a changing environment for employers.  It will be an interesting few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/#comment-11684</guid>
		<description>Not if you&#039;re actually a lawyer, rather than someone who plays one on the Internet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not if you&#8217;re actually a lawyer, rather than someone who plays one on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11683</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/what-comes-after-ledbetter-an-update/#comment-11683</guid>
		<description>What comes after &lt;i&gt;Ledbetter&lt;/i&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://stubbornfacts.us/politics/ledbetter_congress_springs_into_action&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;H.R. 2831, apparently&lt;/a&gt;. It seems fruitless to speculate what courts are going to do when Congress has indicated quite strongly that it intends to (and probably will) pass a response of some kind, doesn&#039;t it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What comes after <i>Ledbetter</i>? <a href="http://stubbornfacts.us/politics/ledbetter_congress_springs_into_action" rel="nofollow">H.R. 2831, apparently</a>. It seems fruitless to speculate what courts are going to do when Congress has indicated quite strongly that it intends to (and probably will) pass a response of some kind, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.456 seconds -->
