<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US: CIA tapes issue not for courts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/us-cia-tapes-issue-not-for-courts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/us-cia-tapes-issue-not-for-courts/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Van Winkle</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/us-cia-tapes-issue-not-for-courts/comment-page-1/#comment-13756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Van Winkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/us-cia-tapes-issue-not-for-courts/#comment-13756</guid>
		<description>The government&#039;s position is that two branches of government are enough to investigate this matter.  Since Justice also objects to Congress investigating and will apparently refuse to cooperate, that leaves only one branch.  Let&#039;s have two branches investigate--Congress and the courts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government&#8217;s position is that two branches of government are enough to investigate this matter.  Since Justice also objects to Congress investigating and will apparently refuse to cooperate, that leaves only one branch.  Let&#8217;s have two branches investigate&#8211;Congress and the courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.430 seconds -->
