Upcoming Schedule
Next Monday at 10am, the Court will issue opinions and orders. The Court will then go into recess until April 18.
- WaPo: From Justice Stevens, No Exit Signs
- NYT: Papers Offer Close-Up of Rehnquist and the Court
- LAT: Who would Obama pick for the Supreme Court?
- NPR “On The Media”: Enya Gets Played
- Law.com: Inside the High Court: Statutory Text and Scalia’s Teeth
- WSJ: 10 Commandments vs. 7 Aphorisms: A New Religion Covets Legitimacy
- Legal Times: Supreme Court Justices Hear Arguments in Religious Monument Case
- NPR: High Court Sides With Navy In Sonar Dispute
- LAT: Ruling Unlikely to Quell Sonar Storm
- NYT: Justices Grapple With Question of Church Monument as Free Speech Issue
- NYT: Supreme Court Rules for Navy in Sonar Case
- WaPo: Display of Religious Tenets Debated
- WaPo: Justices Revoke Limits On Navy Use of Sonar
- Bloomberg: U.S. Supreme Court Lifts Restrictions on Navy Sonar
- CSM: Court to Weigh Utah Sect’s Monument
- NPR: Supreme Court Hears Religious Display Case
- Legal Times: Despite Obama Victory, Will Supreme Court Justices Sit Tight?
- NYT: Court Weighs How Juries Should Hear Lab Evidence
- NYT: From Tiny Sect, Weighty Issue for Justices
- LAT: Supreme Court Upholds ‘Victim Impact Evidence’
- LAT: Domestic violence abusers could get gun rights
- WaPo: High Court May Consider Legality of Detention
- ProJo: For high court, Obama could tap nonjurists
- First Amendment Center: ‘Hillary movie:’ campaign-finance victim?
- WaPo: Submarines and Whales
- WSJ: A Monument to Government Power
- WSJ: The Greens Get Harpooned
- Slate: Everything Vibrates
- NYT: A Case of Religious Discrimination
- First Amendment Center: Summum Case Not Just About Religion
- C&C: Bell v. Kelly Drop-Kicked
- VC: Romanette
- BLT: Nino Scalia, Mark Lanier, and Bambi
- WSJ Law Blog: Justice Scalia: I Want to Apologize . . .
- Prawfsblawg: Oral Argument in Summum
- Prawfsblawg: Mathiness
- C&C: SCOTUS Today
- WSJ Law Blog: Seven Aphorisms and the First Amendment: A Look at Oral Arguments
- C&C: Nailed
- BLT: Divided Supreme Court Rules for Navy in Sonar Case
- WSJ Law Blog: Navy Wins, Whales Lose at High Court
- WSJ Environmental Capital: Thar She Blows: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Navy, Against Whales
- WSJ: On the Seven Aphorisms, Private Speech and . . . Beef?
- BLT: Assistant to SG Teaches Chief Justice a New Word
- BLT: Supreme Court Posts Video in Victim Impact Case
Visit our sister site
Press 
Commentary
Blog Round-Up
You need Flash 8 or higher to view the SCOTUSblog calendar.
-
Authors
-
Tom
Tom Goldstein
Partner, Akin Gump -
Amy
Amy Howe
Partner, H&R -
Pattie
Patricia Millett
Partner, Akin Gump -
Kevin
Kevin Russell
Partner, H&R -
Lyle
Lyle Denniston
Reporter, SCOTUSblog -
Ben
Ben Winograd
Akin Gump -
Kristina
Kristina Moore
Akin Gump -
Brian
Brian Sagona
Akin Gump -
Max
Max Schwartz
Akin Gump -
Eliza
Eliza Presson
Howe & Russell -
David
David Stras
Univ. of Minnesota
-
Hello,
Any chance they will have an opinion on Ashcroft v. Raich?
TG responds: It’s certainly a possibility.
Comment by Sean Sirrine — April 1, 2005 @ 6:01 pm
What opinion do you’ll have of David Souter?
Comment by Thomas — April 2, 2005 @ 11:53 pm
free rape stories
date rape gay rape gang rape
Comment by Anonymous — July 16, 2005 @ 4:32 pm