<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tory v. Cochran Mootness Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/tory-v-cochran-mootness-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/tory-v-cochran-mootness-update/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Legal Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/tory-v-cochran-mootness-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6556</link>
		<dc:creator>The Legal Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 02:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/tory-v-cochran-mootness-update/#comment-6556</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can the Supreme Court Still Rule On Johnnie Cochran&#039;s Freedom-of-Speech Case?&lt;/strong&gt;

Johnnie Cochran, the all-star attorney who defended high-profile clients such as O.J. Simpson, Michael Jackson, and Snoop Dogg, died yesterday of a brain tumor. Just last Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Tory v. Cochran, a case in...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can the Supreme Court Still Rule On Johnnie Cochran&#8217;s Freedom-of-Speech Case?</strong></p>
<p>Johnnie Cochran, the all-star attorney who defended high-profile clients such as O.J. Simpson, Michael Jackson, and Snoop Dogg, died yesterday of a brain tumor. Just last Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Tory v. Cochran, a case in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.349 seconds -->
