http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/tomorrows-argument-in-hammon-v-indiana/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/tomorrows-argument-in-hammon-v-indiana/comment-page-1/#comment-9098 ContraSapphic Sun, 09 Apr 2006 04:39:21 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/tomorrows-argument-in-hammon-v-indiana/#comment-9098 More trisks around the Constitution. It's silly for anyone to argue that allowing testimony that cannot be cross examined for this specific type of case - DV - is not simply (1) chivalry on the part of Justices that support it and (2) a hat tip to feminist ideology. More trisks around the Constitution. It’s silly for anyone to argue that allowing testimony that cannot be cross examined for this specific type of case – DV – is not simply (1) chivalry on the part of Justices that support it and (2) a hat tip to feminist ideology.

]]>