Today at the Supreme Court: 12/29/06
The Supreme Court is in recess until its Conference on Friday, Jan. 5.
No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders or opinions are expected to be issued today.
No Comments »
No comments yet.
- CS Monitor: Guantánamo Detainees: shorter wait?
- Legal Times: Next Term: A Fatter, Faster Calendar for Supreme Court
- WaPo: Lots of Questions, Little Agreement at D.C. Hearing on Gun Laws
- NYT: Justice Dept. Admits Error in Not Briefing Court
- NYT: In Court Ruling on Executions, a Factual Flaw
- AP: FBI Chief: Gun Ruling Makes Campuses Less Secure
- WaPo: Surprising Fact: Half of Gun Deaths are Suicides
- WaPo: Gun Bill Provides for Self-Defense
- NYT: Guantánamo Detainee Faces War Crimes Charges in Attack on Destroyer
- NYT: Evidence Faulted in Detainee Case
- Legal Times: Alan Gura’s Victory Lap
- Legal Times: Supreme Court Wrap-Up: (Mostly) In Tune
- Legal Times: Despite June Fireworks, a Calmer Supreme Court Term
- NPR: Supreme Court Ends Term with Tough Decisions
- CSM: A Less Deferential High Court
- NY Sun: Why Not Here?
- NY Sun: Supreme Court Decision May Permit Felons To Own Guns
- Washington Times: Gun Ruling’s Impact on Election Unclear
- Washington Times: Gun Ruling’s Impact on Election Unclear
- LAT: Supreme Court Blocs Rarely Wavered
- AP: Long Quiet, Justices End Their Term with a Growl
- WaPo: A Win by McCain Could Push a Split Court to Right
- WaPo: Gun Shops Await New D.C. Rules
- NYT: Challenges to Bans on Handguns Begin
- NYT: On Court That Defied Labeling, Kennedy Made the Boldest Mark
- NYT: Important Supreme Court Decisions, 2007-2008
- WSJ: Individual Rights Make Headway
- WSJ: The Enemy Detainee Mess
- NYT: A Supreme Court on the Brink
- NYT: Of Whales and National Security
- CQ: High Court’s Campaign Finance Ruling Poses Threat to State Laws
- FindLaw: The Lessons of the Supreme Court’s Recent Decision Granting a Huge Victory to Exxon in the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Case
- WSJ: After Guantanamo
- Legal Times: Court Misfired on Safety Case for Guns
- Legal Times: Decency Demanded ‘No’ Vote on Death
- First Amendment Center: Davis: Leveling rich candidates’ speech unjustified
- National law Journal: Punitives Take Hit in ‘Exxon’ Ruling, but How Hard?
- WaPo: The Court vs. Voters
- First Amendment Center: Leveling Rich Candidates’ Speech Unjustified
- Legal Times: Supreme Court Watch
- FindLaw: The Supreme Court’s Blockbuster Second Amendment Ruling: What the Court Resolved and What it Left Open
- NY Sun: Heller’s Kitchen
- LAT: The Evolving Supreme Court
- WSJ: Some Gun Rules We Can All Agree On
- WSJ: Common Sense on Punitive Damages
- WaPo: Punishing an Enormity
- WaPo: Guns for Safety? Dream On, Scalia.
- WaPo: Millionaires Win
- WaPo: Obama’s Dodge on Handguns
- WaPo: A Death Penalty Puzzle
- WaPo: Guns: The Next Step
- NYT: The Chief Justice, Dylan and the Disappearing Double Negative
- NYT: Gun Laws and Crime: A Complex Relationship
- NYT: It’s Nice to Be Rich
- Setnencing Law: Could All the Mistakes in Kennedy Be Corrected?
- Sentencing Law: Looking Ahead to SCOTUS Docket Dynamics
- Convictions: If a Federal Statute Falls in the Forest and No One’s Around, Does It Make a Sound (or Undermine What Would Otherwise Be a “National Consensus”)?
- Balkinization: Does the Constitution Protect a Substantive Right to Hunt?
- Volokh: Don’t Believe Everything You Read
- Volokh: More on the Overlooked Military Law in Kennedy v. Louisiana
- BLT: Reopening Kennedy v. Louisiana?
- Dorf on Law: What Did You Know and When Did You Know It?
- NPR: Thurgood Marshall Would Turn 100 Today
- Balkinization: For Thurgood Marshall’s Centennial
- Balkinization: Is Heller an Original Meaning Decision?
- Concurring Opinions: Tribal Court Jurisdiction
- WaPo: McCain’s Supreme Court Judgment Calls
- WSJ Law Blog: NYT’s Greenhouse: Supreme Court Erred in Child Rape Case
- Faculty Lounge: Heller Highwater: Second Amendment Protection And The Criminal Law
- Sentencing Law and Policy: Prosecutorial headaches after Heller
- Balkinization: Through the Looking Glass: Indefinite Detention and the Parhat Case
- FindandReplace: Preserving the Right of Resistance
- Volokh: What’s Dionne Been Drinking?
- Concurring Opinions: So, what the Heller our friends at the ACLU going to do now?
- WSJ Law Blog: Court Chides Gov’t in Detainee Case: What I Tell You Three Times Is True
- The Faculty Lounge: Cass Sunstein Discovers Law Review Articles Can Kill
- Sentencing Law and Policy: Defense lawyers win: initial reflections on the SCOTUS term that was
- Convictions: Will Heller Implode?
- Convictions: Shareholders You Can Do Without
- Convictions: Roe and Partisan Entrenchment
- Convictions: Roe, Heller, Politics, and Jack
- Balkinization: Originalism and Guns Redux
- Balkinization: Money Talks, but is it Speech?
- Balkinization: Are Campaign-Finance Laws Inherently Incumbent Protecting? Are All Election Laws?
- Volokh: “Pledges of Centrism”
- Volokh: What is the right protected in the Heller dissent?
- Volokh: Were the Opinions in Heller Scholarly?
- Volokh: Why Campaign Finance Laws are Likely to be Incumbent-Protection Laws
- WSJ Law Blog: Scalia: ‘I Didn’t Bring it Into the Courts. Mr. Gore Brought it Into the Courts.’
Visit our sister site
Press 
Commentary
Blog Round-Up
You need Flash 8 or higher to view the SCOTUSblog calendar.
-
Authors
-
Tom
Tom Goldstein
Partner, Akin Gump -
Amy
Amy Howe
Partner, H&R -
Pattie
Patricia Millett
Partner, Akin Gump -
Kevin
Kevin Russell
Partner, H&R -
Lyle
Lyle Denniston
Reporter, SCOTUSblog -
Jason
Jason Harrow
Akin Gump -
Ben
Ben Winograd
Akin Gump -
Eliza
Eliza Presson
Howe & Russell -
David
David Stras
Univ. of Minnesota
-
