<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The final ten decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/the-final-ten-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/the-final-ten-decisions/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent Scheidegger</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/the-final-ten-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-9950</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Scheidegger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 04:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-final-ten-decisions/#comment-9950</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Sanchez-Llamas&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Bustillo&lt;/i&gt; are both still pending.  Whether there are 10 cases remaining or 11 depends on whether these two are counted separately.  The Court could dispose of them in a single opinion, even while reaching opposite results, as it did with &lt;i&gt;Davis&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Hammon&lt;/i&gt;, or it could have two separate opinions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sanchez-Llamas</i> and <i>Bustillo</i> are both still pending.  Whether there are 10 cases remaining or 11 depends on whether these two are counted separately.  The Court could dispose of them in a single opinion, even while reaching opposite results, as it did with <i>Davis</i> and <i>Hammon</i>, or it could have two separate opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/the-final-ten-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-9949</link>
		<dc:creator>C.Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/the-final-ten-decisions/#comment-9949</guid>
		<description>Did I miss something or did something happen to 04-10566, Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, and 05-51, Bustillo v. Johnson and no one bother to say anything?  Accoring to the docket, they are also in the final group.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I miss something or did something happen to 04-10566, Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, and 05-51, Bustillo v. Johnson and no one bother to say anything?  Accoring to the docket, they are also in the final group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.327 seconds -->
