<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/round-up-63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/round-up-63/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacques McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/round-up-63/comment-page-1/#comment-10920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/round-up-63/#comment-10920</guid>
		<description>Specter&#039;s legislation is nonsense that SCOTUS can feel free to ignore, just like most of his deranged pronouncements on constitutional law, which are designed to endear him to the New York Times.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specter&#8217;s legislation is nonsense that SCOTUS can feel free to ignore, just like most of his deranged pronouncements on constitutional law, which are designed to endear him to the New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.336 seconds -->
