<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Primer on the Guantanamo cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/primer-on-the-guantanamo-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/primer-on-the-guantanamo-cases/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Law and Terrorism Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/primer-on-the-guantanamo-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-6379</link>
		<dc:creator>The Law and Terrorism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/primer-on-the-guantanamo-cases/#comment-6379</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Primer on the Guantanamo cases&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;Almost all chances that the next round in the Guantanamo detainees’ cases will get to the Supreme Court in the current Term have now disappeared, indicating that the multi-faceted constitutional controversy is likely to go over until October. The ca...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Primer on the Guantanamo cases</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Almost all chances that the next round in the Guantanamo detainees’ cases will get to the Supreme Court in the current Term have now disappeared, indicating that the multi-faceted constitutional controversy is likely to go over until October. The ca&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discourse.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/primer-on-the-guantanamo-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>Discourse.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/primer-on-the-guantanamo-cases/#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Guantanamo Case Scorecard&lt;/strong&gt;

Lyle Denniston has posted a roundup of the ongoing Guantanamo-related cases now active in the US courts at the SCOTUSblog....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Guantanamo Case Scorecard</strong></p>
<p>Lyle Denniston has posted a roundup of the ongoing Guantanamo-related cases now active in the US courts at the SCOTUSblog&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.292 seconds -->
