<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Primer on detainees&#8217; status now &#8212; Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/primer-on-detainees-status-now-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/primer-on-detainees-status-now-part-i/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Graeber</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/primer-on-detainees-status-now-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-11200</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Graeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/primer-on-detainees-status-now-part-i/#comment-11200</guid>
		<description>Lyle,

How does Al-Marri v. Wright vary from the Padilla case in regards to habeas?  Couldn&#039;t the government go before the court in Miami and say Padilla no longer has his constitutional rights in tact because of the MCA and DTA?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyle,</p>
<p>How does Al-Marri v. Wright vary from the Padilla case in regards to habeas?  Couldn&#8217;t the government go before the court in Miami and say Padilla no longer has his constitutional rights in tact because of the MCA and DTA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.771 seconds -->
