<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Petitions to Watch &#124; Conference of 1.4.08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-1408/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-1408/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randal Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-1408/comment-page-1/#comment-14026</link>
		<dc:creator>Randal Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-1408/#comment-14026</guid>
		<description>In Covenant Media v. City of N. Charleston SC, No. 07-587, the issue is not &quot;prompt judicial review,&quot; but rather, whether a sign ordinance must contain an explicit time limit on a decision for a sign permit. Decision time limit is one of the elements of &quot;procedural safeguards&quot; for prior restraints on free speech. The City (my client) argues that there is no speech or expressive conduct in the erection of a new billboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Covenant Media v. City of N. Charleston SC, No. 07-587, the issue is not &#8220;prompt judicial review,&#8221; but rather, whether a sign ordinance must contain an explicit time limit on a decision for a sign permit. Decision time limit is one of the elements of &#8220;procedural safeguards&#8221; for prior restraints on free speech. The City (my client) argues that there is no speech or expressive conduct in the erection of a new billboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodore Metzler</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-1408/comment-page-1/#comment-13963</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore Metzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-1408/#comment-13963</guid>
		<description>The Court tends to release the grants on the same day as the conference this time of year, so at least some of these orders could come as early as Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Court tends to release the grants on the same day as the conference this time of year, so at least some of these orders could come as early as Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.391 seconds -->
