Comments on: Orders: Court expands abortion review http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/orders-court-expands-abortion-review/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Kevin Kelly http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/orders-court-expands-abortion-review/comment-page-1/#comment-9865 Kevin Kelly Sun, 25 Jun 2006 01:42:34 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/orders-court-expands-abortion-review/#comment-9865 For an analysis of the partial-birth abortion cases, see http://ssrn.com/abstract=909802 For an analysis of the partial-birth abortion cases, see
http://ssrn.com/abstract=909802

]]> By: joelf http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/orders-court-expands-abortion-review/comment-page-1/#comment-9864 joelf Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:35 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/orders-court-expands-abortion-review/#comment-9864 Any idea why Roberts is recused on Credit Suisse First Boston v. Billing, et al. (05-1157)? Any idea why Roberts is recused on Credit Suisse First Boston v. Billing, et al. (05-1157)?

]]> By: mike liveright http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/orders-court-expands-abortion-review/comment-page-1/#comment-9863 mike liveright Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:49:37 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/orders-court-expands-abortion-review/#comment-9863 <b>State lower court ruling</b> <p> Thanks for your site, but re this article, etc., where you post the cases that the supremes refused to hear it would be helpful if you gave a short summary of the lower court's decision, and even by how much. <p> Though I don't know what was the truth, the first decision could, if true, be stated as: <p> <ul> "Other issues that the Court refused to hear were: <br />** Whether federal law..." <i>[States law permitted 5-3]</i> <p> . . . OR WHATEVER. </p></ul> <p> As we all know, the cases that the Supremes decide not to hear are probably less important than those that they decide to hear, but the un-heard cases still set the law of the land and give an impression as to what the Supremes decisions would be?</p></p></p></p> State lower court ruling

Thanks for your site, but re this article, etc., where you post the cases that the supremes refused to hear it would be helpful if you gave a short summary of the lower court’s decision, and even by how much.

Though I don’t know what was the truth, the first decision could, if true, be stated as:

    “Other issues that the Court refused to hear were:

    ** Whether federal law…” [States law permitted 5-3]

    . . . OR WHATEVER.

As we all know, the cases that the Supremes decide not to hear are probably less important than those that they decide to hear, but the un-heard cases still set the law of the land and give an impression as to what the Supremes decisions would be?

]]>