For example, how in the world did Ronnie White, a man who failed the Missouri bar the first time around, was on academic probation while in law school and who wrote a decision arguing that people who lie to their lawyers can argue on appeal that their lawyers were incompetent for believing them, merit a “Qualified” rating when it rated now-Judge Bunning “Not Qualified”?

Or how does the ABA explain Frederica Massiah-Jacksons “Q/WQ” rating, when her record on the bench, to be charitable, was truly bad?

Or what about the disparity between Jeffrey Sutton’s “Qualified” rating and Eric Clay’s unanimous “Well Qualified” rating. Sutton’s credentials clearly surpassed Clay’s.

These three examples are but a few. The ABA favors Dem nominees. And I think that these examples need to be explained by the ABA. Was Ronnie White overrated, yes or no? Should the ABA’s investigation have disclosed more about Massiah-Jackson? Was Clay overrated?