<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New claim of presidential power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/new-claim-of-presidential-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/new-claim-of-presidential-power/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent Scheidegger</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/new-claim-of-presidential-power/comment-page-1/#comment-11042</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Scheidegger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/new-claim-of-presidential-power/#comment-11042</guid>
		<description>&quot;In the lower court ruling at issue, the Fifth Circuit Court decided....&quot;

I believe you mean the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

&quot;But, after argument, the Court dismissed the case as &#039;improvidently granted,&#039; because Medellin had then recently filed a state court challenge to his conviction based on a violation of the Convention.&quot;

There is considerably more to it than that.  The Court noted multiple obstacles to using federal habeas as the mechanism for complying with Avena.  Medellin&#039;s counsel realized it was going that way, which is why they filed the state petition.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the lower court ruling at issue, the Fifth Circuit Court decided&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe you mean the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.</p>
<p>&#8220;But, after argument, the Court dismissed the case as &#8216;improvidently granted,&#8217; because Medellin had then recently filed a state court challenge to his conviction based on a violation of the Convention.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is considerably more to it than that.  The Court noted multiple obstacles to using federal habeas as the mechanism for complying with Avena.  Medellin&#8217;s counsel realized it was going that way, which is why they filed the state petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/new-claim-of-presidential-power/comment-page-1/#comment-11041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/new-claim-of-presidential-power/#comment-11041</guid>
		<description>The title is misleading. As the brief makes clear, there is no claim of a new presidential power. This is basic presidential power augmented by a treaty structure that vests him with the discretion as to how to enforce it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title is misleading. As the brief makes clear, there is no claim of a new presidential power. This is basic presidential power augmented by a treaty structure that vests him with the discretion as to how to enforce it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.351 seconds -->
