<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marty Lederman Reports from Today&#8217;s Oral Arguments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WILLisms.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6188</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLisms.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6188</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mas Classiness From Other Blogs.&lt;/strong&gt;

Click to explore more WILLisms.com. Professor Bainbridge- [who, incidentally, never even acknowledged my responses to his questions about Social Security, which borders on totally unclassy and way lame on his part] Examines the case before the Supreme...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mas Classiness From Other Blogs.</strong></p>
<p>Click to explore more WILLisms.com. Professor Bainbridge- [who, incidentally, never even acknowledged my responses to his questions about Social Security, which borders on totally unclassy and way lame on his part] Examines the case before the Supreme&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley Spira</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6174</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley Spira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 19:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6174</guid>
		<description>Chalk one up for Leviatan.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chalk one up for Leviatan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6187</link>
		<dc:creator>Local Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6187</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Weekend Reading: &lt;i&gt;Kelo v. New London&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Dig in&#151; A sampling of blogger commentary on one of the more significant property rights cases to reach the Supreme Court: READ OUR TAKE HERE. Here (Legal Affairs--Epstein/), here (Professor Bainbridge), here (SCOTUSblog), here (Slate), here (City ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weekend Reading: <i>Kelo v. New London</i></strong></p>
<p>Dig in&#8212; A sampling of blogger commentary on one of the more significant property rights cases to reach the Supreme Court: READ OUR TAKE HERE. Here (Legal Affairs&#8211;Epstein/), here (Professor Bainbridge), here (SCOTUSblog), here (Slate), here (City &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mean Mr. Mustard 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6186</link>
		<dc:creator>Mean Mr. Mustard 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6186</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Law and Lyrics Friday&lt;/strong&gt;

Given the markedly dreary outlook that seems to be prevailing in the eminent domain case, Kelo v. City of New London, I couldn&#039;t help but recall the Kinks&#039; best album, Muswell Hillbillies. As a whole, it&#039;s one of the best...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Law and Lyrics Friday</strong></p>
<p>Given the markedly dreary outlook that seems to be prevailing in the eminent domain case, Kelo v. City of New London, I couldn&#8217;t help but recall the Kinks&#8217; best album, Muswell Hillbillies. As a whole, it&#8217;s one of the best&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outside The Beltway</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6185</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside The Beltway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6185</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Government to Steal Drugs?&lt;/strong&gt;

Barbara T. Dreyfuss has a disturbing piece in today&#039;s American Prospect.

Unless the drug industry starts to negotiate significantly lower prices, it may find itself battling debt-strapped states for control over the manufacture of drugs. States alr...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Government to Steal Drugs?</strong></p>
<p>Barbara T. Dreyfuss has a disturbing piece in today&#8217;s American Prospect.</p>
<p>Unless the drug industry starts to negotiate significantly lower prices, it may find itself battling debt-strapped states for control over the manufacture of drugs. States alr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Stitch in Haste</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6184</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stitch in Haste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6184</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Post-Kelo Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

The initial reports of the oral arguments from the two eminent domain cases were decidedly pessimistic. But, like the exit polls on Election Day, the accuracy of those early descriptions is now being questioned.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Post-Kelo Roundup</strong></p>
<p>The initial reports of the oral arguments from the two eminent domain cases were decidedly pessimistic. But, like the exit polls on Election Day, the accuracy of those early descriptions is now being questioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6173</link>
		<dc:creator>coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6173</guid>
		<description>Here is my guess for New London&#039;s last four words: &quot;Everything belongs to us&quot;.  Of course &quot;All your base are belong to us&quot; would have been better, but that is seven words.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my guess for New London&#8217;s last four words: &#8220;Everything belongs to us&#8221;.  Of course &#8220;All your base are belong to us&#8221; would have been better, but that is seven words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Re:</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6183</link>
		<dc:creator>In Re:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6183</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kelo&lt;/strong&gt;

Oral arguments on the Kelo case were today.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kelo</strong></p>
<p>Oral arguments on the Kelo case were today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Mind's Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6182</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Mind's Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6182</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;America the land of the soon to be screwed?&lt;/strong&gt;

We have been told for so long that America is land of freedom, but Kelo v. New London and Terri Schiavo&#039;s case present a direct, unavoidable challenge to that assertion. Tomorrow, two of the greatest liberties that form the very...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>America the land of the soon to be screwed?</strong></p>
<p>We have been told for so long that America is land of freedom, but Kelo v. New London and Terri Schiavo&#8217;s case present a direct, unavoidable challenge to that assertion. Tomorrow, two of the greatest liberties that form the very&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6172</guid>
		<description>This review of the oral arguement indicates the death knell for private property rights will soon be tolling.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This review of the oral arguement indicates the death knell for private property rights will soon be tolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cooke</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6171</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6171</guid>
		<description>Hi,

This comment is unrelated to the merits of Kelo.  But with both Justice Stevens and Chief Justice Rehnquist absent today, and Justice O&#039;Connor presiding, I wondered whether today is the first oral argument where a woman presided at the Supreme Court?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>This comment is unrelated to the merits of Kelo.  But with both Justice Stevens and Chief Justice Rehnquist absent today, and Justice O&#8217;Connor presiding, I wondered whether today is the first oral argument where a woman presided at the Supreme Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorBainbridge.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6181</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorBainbridge.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6181</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Will Leviathan Prevail?&lt;/strong&gt;

Today the Supreme Court will hear argument in a case that, as lawyer Martin Garbus put it in the LA Times, will decide the question
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Will Leviathan Prevail?</strong></p>
<p>Today the Supreme Court will hear argument in a case that, as lawyer Martin Garbus put it in the LA Times, will decide the question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JurisPundit</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6180</link>
		<dc:creator>JurisPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6180</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kelo Arguments&lt;/strong&gt;

Here&#039;s to hoping the situation isn&#039;t as bleak as the reporter suggests. Furthermore, I&#039;m not sure that the Court would necessarily have to overrule Midkiff and Berman to rule for the plaintiffs. Comments later...if only there were more hours in the day.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kelo Arguments</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to hoping the situation isn&#8217;t as bleak as the reporter suggests. Furthermore, I&#8217;m not sure that the Court would necessarily have to overrule Midkiff and Berman to rule for the plaintiffs. Comments later&#8230;if only there were more hours in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLisms.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6179</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLisms.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6179</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mas Classiness From Other Blogs.&lt;/strong&gt;

Professor Bainbridge- [who, incidentally, never even acknowledged my responses to his questions about Social Security, which borders on totally unclassy and way lame on his part] Examines the case before the Supreme Court Kelo v. New London, regarding ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mas Classiness From Other Blogs.</strong></p>
<p>Professor Bainbridge- [who, incidentally, never even acknowledged my responses to his questions about Social Security, which borders on totally unclassy and way lame on his part] Examines the case before the Supreme Court Kelo v. New London, regarding &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pejmanesque</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-6178</link>
		<dc:creator>Pejmanesque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/marty-lederman-reports-from-todays-oral-arguments/#comment-6178</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ALAS . . .&lt;/strong&gt;

The oral argument in Kelo appears not to have gone well for those who are on the side of the angels. I suspect that at the very least, Scalia, Thomas and Rehnquist will side with the property owners, but O&#039;Connor...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ALAS . . .</strong></p>
<p>The oral argument in Kelo appears not to have gone well for those who are on the side of the angels. I suspect that at the very least, Scalia, Thomas and Rehnquist will side with the property owners, but O&#8217;Connor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.723 seconds -->
