<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: June 6th Opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/june-6th-opinions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/june-6th-opinions/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Someguy</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/june-6th-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-7051</link>
		<dc:creator>Someguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/june-6th-opinions/#comment-7051</guid>
		<description>&quot;before&quot; as in temporally, got it.  I was thinking before as in &quot;before the Supreme Court&quot; physically.  Was confused.  My bad.

TG responds:  Don&#039;t be silly.  Sorry for the ambiguity.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;before&#8221; as in temporally, got it.  I was thinking before as in &#8220;before the Supreme Court&#8221; physically.  Was confused.  My bad.</p>
<p>TG responds:  Don&#8217;t be silly.  Sorry for the ambiguity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someguy</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/june-6th-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-7050</link>
		<dc:creator>Someguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/june-6th-opinions/#comment-7050</guid>
		<description>I think they still owe us Orff v US as well -- (Feb 23) -- unless I can&#039;t find it.

TG responds:  Marty was just referring to cases before the February sitting.  Several February cases are still outstanding, including particularly Kelo and the Ten Commandments cases.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they still owe us Orff v US as well &#8212; (Feb 23) &#8212; unless I can&#8217;t find it.</p>
<p>TG responds:  Marty was just referring to cases before the February sitting.  Several February cases are still outstanding, including particularly Kelo and the Ten Commandments cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Agitator</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/june-6th-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-7053</link>
		<dc:creator>The Agitator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/june-6th-opinions/#comment-7053</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It was Scalia...&lt;/strong&gt;

...who killed federalism. Hypocrite. He did write a concurring opinion, so it&#039;ll be interesting to see how he wriggled out...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It was Scalia&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;who killed federalism. Hypocrite. He did write a concurring opinion, so it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how he wriggled out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crescat Sententia</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/june-6th-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-7052</link>
		<dc:creator>Crescat Sententia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/june-6th-opinions/#comment-7052</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Remains of the Coonstitution&lt;/strong&gt;

I have just returned from the Supreme Court, where I snagged a copy of Raich for my employers and read it in the taxi on the way over. Stevens writes for Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, none of whom write separately....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Remains of the Coonstitution</strong></p>
<p>I have just returned from the Supreme Court, where I snagged a copy of Raich for my employers and read it in the taxi on the way over. Stevens writes for Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, none of whom write separately&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.382 seconds -->
