<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Mass v. EPA &#8220;SCRAP for a New Generation&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/is-mass-v-epa-scrap-for-a-new-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/is-mass-v-epa-scrap-for-a-new-generation/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacques McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/is-mass-v-epa-scrap-for-a-new-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-11065</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/is-mass-v-epa-scrap-for-a-new-generation/#comment-11065</guid>
		<description>What this means is that the next SCOTUS nominee will be quizzed about prudential standing requirements by Republican Senators on the Judiciary Committee. It further means that climate change will be a more salient issue in upcoming governor&#039;s races.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this means is that the next SCOTUS nominee will be quizzed about prudential standing requirements by Republican Senators on the Judiciary Committee. It further means that climate change will be a more salient issue in upcoming governor&#8217;s races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.763 seconds -->
