<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huge tobacco case seems Court-bound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/huge-tobacco-case-seems-court-bound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/huge-tobacco-case-seems-court-bound/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: White Collar Crime Prof Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/huge-tobacco-case-seems-court-bound/comment-page-1/#comment-6619</link>
		<dc:creator>White Collar Crime Prof Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/huge-tobacco-case-seems-court-bound/#comment-6619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DC Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc in Tobacco RICO Cases&lt;/strong&gt;

The DC Circuit refused the government&#039;s petition for a rehearing en banc of the panel&#039;s decision on Feb. 4 that threw out the government&#039;s request that the tobacco company defendants be ordered to disgorge $280 billion in profits from their
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DC Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc in Tobacco RICO Cases</strong></p>
<p>The DC Circuit refused the government&#8217;s petition for a rehearing en banc of the panel&#8217;s decision on Feb. 4 that threw out the government&#8217;s request that the tobacco company defendants be ordered to disgorge $280 billion in profits from their</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMOORE</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/huge-tobacco-case-seems-court-bound/comment-page-1/#comment-6618</link>
		<dc:creator>JMOORE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/huge-tobacco-case-seems-court-bound/#comment-6618</guid>
		<description>Many were surprised that en banc was actually sought by the DOJ.  I think an appeal to SCOTUS is probably unlikely.  Cert being even more unlikely.  Do you think otherwise?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many were surprised that en banc was actually sought by the DOJ.  I think an appeal to SCOTUS is probably unlikely.  Cert being even more unlikely.  Do you think otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.322 seconds -->
