<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government appeals on tobacco remedy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/comment-page-1/#comment-7829</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/#comment-7829</guid>
		<description>Clement&#039;s disqualification is surely based on his representation of Lorillard while at King &amp; Spalding.  &lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clement&#8217;s disqualification is surely based on his representation of Lorillard while at King &#038; Spalding.  <a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Supreme Court Nomination Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/comment-page-1/#comment-7831</link>
		<dc:creator>The Supreme Court Nomination Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/#comment-7831</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rolling List of Interesting Opinions By Judge Clement&lt;/strong&gt;

We&#039;ll be updating this on an ongoing basis: Federalism U.S. v. McFarland, 311 F.3d 376 (CA5 2002) - A defendant who had been convicted of violating the Hobbs Act challenged his conviction on the grounds that the evidence against him...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rolling List of Interesting Opinions By Judge Clement</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be updating this on an ongoing basis: Federalism U.S. v. McFarland, 311 F.3d 376 (CA5 2002) &#8211; A defendant who had been convicted of violating the Hobbs Act challenged his conviction on the grounds that the evidence against him&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Supreme Court Nomination Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/comment-page-1/#comment-7830</link>
		<dc:creator>The Supreme Court Nomination Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/government-appeals-on-tobacco-remedy/#comment-7830</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rolling List of Interesting Opinions By Judge Clement&lt;/strong&gt;

We&#039;ll be updating this on an ongoing basis: Business Cases Bratcher v. Nat&#039;l Standard Life Ins. Co. (In re Monumental Life Ins. Co.), 365 F.3d 408 (CA5 2004) - dissented from panel decision authorizing class action to challenge racial discrimination...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rolling List of Interesting Opinions By Judge Clement</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be updating this on an ongoing basis: Business Cases Bratcher v. Nat&#8217;l Standard Life Ins. Co. (In re Monumental Life Ins. Co.), 365 F.3d 408 (CA5 2004) &#8211; dissented from panel decision authorizing class action to challenge racial discrimination&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.379 seconds -->
