Comments on: First StatPack, and a State of the Docket Update http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: David.Huberman http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12018 David.Huberman Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:48:28 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/#comment-12018 Andy: The final OT06 "Super" StatPack is found at: http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/06/ot06_the_statis.html Andy:

The final OT06 “Super” StatPack is found at:

http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/06/ot06_the_statis.html

]]> By: Andy Grewal http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12017 Andy Grewal Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:44:21 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/#comment-12017 Is there a statpack available for OT06? It looks like a very useful tool. Thank you. -Andy Grewal Is there a statpack available for OT06? It looks like a very useful tool. Thank you.

-Andy Grewal

]]> By: David.Huberman http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12016 David.Huberman Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:22:15 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/#comment-12016 To steal a line from Aaron Streett, Rivermaster Lancaster is all-powerful. Fait accompli, indeed. To steal a line from Aaron Streett, Rivermaster Lancaster is all-powerful. Fait accompli, indeed.

]]> By: Roger Friedman http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12015 Roger Friedman Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:28:47 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/first-statpack-and-a-state-of-the-docket-update/#comment-12015 Welcome back Jason. I wouldn't look for much argument in NJ v. DE. The Special Master's report is very solid. NJ will be left to argue over historical facts. That didn't stop the Court from hearing argument the Ellis Island case, perhaps the Court feels it owes its original docket an argument. But when DE gets up, perhaps Roberts will say, Kozinskishly, "Is there anything in the argument that you haven't covered in your brief?" Welcome back Jason. I wouldn’t look for much argument in NJ v. DE. The Special Master’s report is very solid. NJ will be left to argue over historical facts. That didn’t stop the Court from hearing argument the Ellis Island case, perhaps the Court feels it owes its original docket an argument. But when DE gets up, perhaps Roberts will say, Kozinskishly, “Is there anything in the argument that you haven’t covered in your brief?”

]]>