<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First new briefs on detainees&#8217; rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-new-briefs-on-detainees-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-new-briefs-on-detainees-rights/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/first-new-briefs-on-detainees-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-10566</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/first-new-briefs-on-detainees-rights/#comment-10566</guid>
		<description>First of all, ScotusBLOG is terrific.

Secondly, may I presume the appeals court action off of the newly enacted law will end up in the Supreme Court?  If that is so, will Justice Roberts be able to participate, as he could not do in Hamdan?

-Shaun Mullen
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, ScotusBLOG is terrific.</p>
<p>Secondly, may I presume the appeals court action off of the newly enacted law will end up in the Supreme Court?  If that is so, will Justice Roberts be able to participate, as he could not do in Hamdan?</p>
<p>-Shaun Mullen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.456 seconds -->
