Comments on: Discussion Board: A View from the Petitioning States http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/discussion-board-a-view-from-the-petitioning-states/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Taylor Reynolds http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/discussion-board-a-view-from-the-petitioning-states/comment-page-1/#comment-11074 Taylor Reynolds Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:46:40 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/discussion-board-a-view-from-the-petitioning-states/#comment-11074 "What this case and Watters show is that federalism is neither intrinsically conservative nor progressive." I don't know about Watters, but what this case shows is that standing jurisprudence is determined by the merits of cases. There's just no other plausible way to explain the Court's wholesale creation of a novel approach to state standing here. “What this case and Watters show is that federalism is neither intrinsically conservative nor progressive.”

I don’t know about Watters, but what this case shows is that standing jurisprudence is determined by the merits of cases. There’s just no other plausible way to explain the Court’s wholesale creation of a novel approach to state standing here.

]]>