<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court upholds federal regulation of banks&#8217; mortgage lending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-upholds-federal-regulation-of-banks-mortgage-lending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-upholds-federal-regulation-of-banks-mortgage-lending/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Grewal</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-upholds-federal-regulation-of-banks-mortgage-lending/comment-page-1/#comment-11089</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Grewal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-upholds-federal-regulation-of-banks-mortgage-lending/#comment-11089</guid>
		<description>With all the hoopla over clerk influence, I think it&#039;s amusing to observe that in Watters, &quot;Justice Stevens,&quot; writing in dissent, cited his own clerk in  footnote 24. (Or, at least, Google tells me the author of the Note cited in that footnote is one of Stevens&#039; 2006-2007 clerks.)

Not to say there is anything wrong with that --  quoting one&#039;s self seems like an appropriate job perk for a SCOTUS clerk. I just thought it interesting to see a Justice actually quoting his own clerk in light of all the supposed controversy over clerk influence.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the hoopla over clerk influence, I think it&#8217;s amusing to observe that in Watters, &#8220;Justice Stevens,&#8221; writing in dissent, cited his own clerk in  footnote 24. (Or, at least, Google tells me the author of the Note cited in that footnote is one of Stevens&#8217; 2006-2007 clerks.)</p>
<p>Not to say there is anything wrong with that &#8212;  quoting one&#8217;s self seems like an appropriate job perk for a SCOTUS clerk. I just thought it interesting to see a Justice actually quoting his own clerk in light of all the supposed controversy over clerk influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->
