Comments on: Court: no stay in Schiavo case http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/comment-page-1/#comment-6468 Anonymous Sun, 31 Jul 2005 07:56:05 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/#comment-6468 <strong>ladyboys</strong> <a href="http://traffic.dnip.net" rel="nofollow">tranny</a> shemale cum <a href="http://traffic.dnip.net/shemale.html" rel="nofollow">shemale cum</a> tranny <a href="http://traffic.dnip.net/shemales.html" rel="nofollow">ladyboys</a> trannys <a href="http://traffic.dnip.net/tranny.html" rel="nofollow">shemale cu...</a> ladyboys

tranny shemale cum shemale cum tranny ladyboys trannys shemale cu…

]]> By: abba http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/comment-page-1/#comment-6466 abba Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:25:04 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/#comment-6466 Thank you for great web site, i have discovered it recently, lots of good read Thank you for great web site, i have discovered it recently, lots of good read

]]> By: The Daily Jimbo http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/comment-page-1/#comment-6467 The Daily Jimbo Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:07:38 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/#comment-6467 <strong>SCOTUS denies cert in Schiavo case</strong> SCOTUS denies cert in Schiavo case

]]> By: J. J. Gass http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/comment-page-1/#comment-6465 J. J. Gass Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:12:20 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/court-no-stay-in-schiavo-case/#comment-6465 Did the SG support the application? My understanding was that the government had filed a "statement of interest" in either the district or circuit court (or both), supporting the initial TRO application or the appeal from the denial (or both). In light of excerpts I've read of the Schindler's stay application, their filing didn't strike me as reflecting the tone used by experienced Supreme Court practitioners, and it occurred to me that the Court might be favorably impressed if the SG were to argue in more measured tones that this particular public law warranted a stay pending a trial de novo. Did the SG support the application? My understanding was that the government had filed a “statement of interest” in either the district or circuit court (or both), supporting the initial TRO application or the appeal from the denial (or both). In light of excerpts I’ve read of the Schindler’s stay application, their filing didn’t strike me as reflecting the tone used by experienced Supreme Court practitioners, and it occurred to me that the Court might be favorably impressed if the SG were to argue in more measured tones that this particular public law warranted a stay pending a trial de novo.

]]>