<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commentary: The Court&#8217;s caseload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/commentary-the-courts-caseload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/commentary-the-courts-caseload/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/commentary-the-courts-caseload/comment-page-1/#comment-8177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/commentary-the-courts-caseload/#comment-8177</guid>
		<description>The suggestion of two parallel pools was given by Roberts himself, as you can read for yourself at the link found in Lyle&#039;s post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The suggestion of two parallel pools was given by Roberts himself, as you can read for yourself at the link found in Lyle&#8217;s post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Writs</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/commentary-the-courts-caseload/comment-page-1/#comment-8176</link>
		<dc:creator>All Writs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/commentary-the-courts-caseload/#comment-8176</guid>
		<description>Why not simply split the the cert pool in half and create two pools to review every cert petition (in addition to the JPS pool).  You could even split the pools with justices appointed before 1992 and those appointed after 1992 as the demarcation line for which clerks go where.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not simply split the the cert pool in half and create two pools to review every cert petition (in addition to the JPS pool).  You could even split the pools with justices appointed before 1992 and those appointed after 1992 as the demarcation line for which clerks go where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnLipton</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/commentary-the-courts-caseload/comment-page-1/#comment-8175</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnLipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/commentary-the-courts-caseload/#comment-8175</guid>
		<description>Clerks don&#039;t just fear embarrassment if they recommend a grant that is subsequently denied.  It&#039;s more work to write a memo that recommends a grant -- it requires more research.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clerks don&#8217;t just fear embarrassment if they recommend a grant that is subsequently denied.  It&#8217;s more work to write a memo that recommends a grant &#8212; it requires more research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladyprof</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/commentary-the-courts-caseload/comment-page-1/#comment-8174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladyprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/commentary-the-courts-caseload/#comment-8174</guid>
		<description>On Sept. 27 Lyle posted links to a couple of the briefs related to the Petitioner&#039;s side in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood.  Respondents&#039; brief and their amici can be found at http://www.ayottevplannedparenthood.org/documents/briefs-amici.php
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sept. 27 Lyle posted links to a couple of the briefs related to the Petitioner&#8217;s side in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood.  Respondents&#8217; brief and their amici can be found at <a href="http://www.ayottevplannedparenthood.org/documents/briefs-amici.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.ayottevplannedparenthood.org/documents/briefs-amici.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.480 seconds -->
