<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis:  Some Thoughts on Opinion Authorship and the Dynamic in the Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-some-thoughts-on-opinion-authorship-and-the-dynamic-in-the-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-some-thoughts-on-opinion-authorship-and-the-dynamic-in-the-court/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lewallen</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-some-thoughts-on-opinion-authorship-and-the-dynamic-in-the-court/comment-page-1/#comment-11424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lewallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/analysis-some-thoughts-on-opinion-authorship-and-the-dynamic-in-the-court/#comment-11424</guid>
		<description>A Breyer dissent would also make sense because of his Zelman v. Simmons-Harris dissent that focused on &quot;real world&quot; consequences, and the fact that he was the only other Justice to sign on to Ginsburg&#039;s Grutter concurrence.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Breyer dissent would also make sense because of his Zelman v. Simmons-Harris dissent that focused on &#8220;real world&#8221; consequences, and the fact that he was the only other Justice to sign on to Ginsburg&#8217;s Grutter concurrence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Berlove</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-some-thoughts-on-opinion-authorship-and-the-dynamic-in-the-court/comment-page-1/#comment-11423</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Berlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/analysis-some-thoughts-on-opinion-authorship-and-the-dynamic-in-the-court/#comment-11423</guid>
		<description>Mr. Goldstein,
Why do you assume that Kennedy writing in Panetti would mean a victory for the defendant?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Goldstein,<br />
Why do you assume that Kennedy writing in Panetti would mean a victory for the defendant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.315 seconds -->
