<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis: A &#8220;moratorium&#8221; on lethal injection?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-a-moratorium-on-lethal-injection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-a-moratorium-on-lethal-injection/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent Scheidegger</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-a-moratorium-on-lethal-injection/comment-page-1/#comment-12260</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Scheidegger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/analysis-a-moratorium-on-lethal-injection/#comment-12260</guid>
		<description>Alas, I was hoping the Court would shed a little more light on which cases should be stayed and which should not. They have only stayed &lt;i&gt;Emmett&lt;/i&gt; &quot;pending final disposition of the appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit....&quot; The Fourth could summarily affirm tomorrow, terminating the stay. Presumably they decided the appeal had no merit before they denied the stay. See &lt;i&gt;Barefoot&lt;/i&gt; v. &lt;i&gt;Estelle&lt;/i&gt;, 463 U.S. 880 (1983).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, I was hoping the Court would shed a little more light on which cases should be stayed and which should not. They have only stayed <i>Emmett</i> &#8220;pending final disposition of the appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit&#8230;.&#8221; The Fourth could summarily affirm tomorrow, terminating the stay. Presumably they decided the appeal had no merit before they denied the stay. See <i>Barefoot</i> v. <i>Estelle</i>, 463 U.S. 880 (1983).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.671 seconds -->
