<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Academic Round-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/academic-round-up-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/academic-round-up-15/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Academic Round-Up &#124; SCOTUSblog</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/academic-round-up-15/comment-page-1/#comment-14383</link>
		<dc:creator>Academic Round-Up &#124; SCOTUSblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/academic-round-up-15/#comment-14383</guid>
		<description>[...] see here.  Both pieces were previously discussed in these two academic round-ups, see here and here.   As I noted previously, the Court held in Bowles that the statutory time limitation for filing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see here.  Both pieces were previously discussed in these two academic round-ups, see here and here.   As I noted previously, the Court held in Bowles that the statutory time limitation for filing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.412 seconds -->
