<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A sharp debate on presidential power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/a-sharp-debate-on-presidential-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/a-sharp-debate-on-presidential-power/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Camirfar</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/a-sharp-debate-on-presidential-power/comment-page-1/#comment-8016</link>
		<dc:creator>Camirfar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 20:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/a-sharp-debate-on-presidential-power/#comment-8016</guid>
		<description>Just a note for those interested in reading further:  all the briefs filed to date in the Medellin case, in support of our client and in support of Texas, can be found on the website of Debevoise &amp; Plimpton, at http://www.debevoise.com/newseventspubs/news/RepresentationDetail.aspx?exp_id=70b4b744-00d6-4ef0-94ae-0400cd3f255b
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note for those interested in reading further:  all the briefs filed to date in the Medellin case, in support of our client and in support of Texas, can be found on the website of Debevoise &#038; Plimpton, at <a href="http://www.debevoise.com/newseventspubs/news/RepresentationDetail.aspx?exp_id=70b4b744-00d6-4ef0-94ae-0400cd3f255b" rel="nofollow">http://www.debevoise.com/newseventspubs/news/RepresentationDetail.aspx?exp_id=70b4b744-00d6-4ef0-94ae-0400cd3f255b</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Scheidegger</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/a-sharp-debate-on-presidential-power/comment-page-1/#comment-8015</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Scheidegger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/a-sharp-debate-on-presidential-power/#comment-8015</guid>
		<description>Here is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjlf.org/briefs/MedellinCCA.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CJLF brief&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;Medellin&lt;/em&gt; case.  It does not address the issues described in Lyle&#039;s post, but instead asserts that Medellin has already received the determination of &quot;prejudice&quot; the ICJ said he was entitled to.  Such a decision would not be as dramatic as one dealing with weighty issues of constitutional and international law, but it would bring this case more quickly to its long-overdue conclusion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the <a href="http://www.cjlf.org/briefs/MedellinCCA.pdf" rel="nofollow">CJLF brief</a> in the <em>Medellin</em> case.  It does not address the issues described in Lyle&#8217;s post, but instead asserts that Medellin has already received the determination of &#8220;prejudice&#8221; the ICJ said he was entitled to.  Such a decision would not be as dramatic as one dealing with weighty issues of constitutional and international law, but it would bring this case more quickly to its long-overdue conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.442 seconds -->
