Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

There is a possibility of opinions on Thursday at 10 a.m. We will begin live-blogging at 9 a.m. at this link, where readers can also sign up for an email reminder when we start the live blog.
We are hosting an online symposium on the Supreme Court’s opinions in partisan-gerrymandering cases Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone. Contributions to the symposium and additional coverage are available on our case page for Gill.
Our statistics page presents the data on each sitting – the cases (14 remain undecided) and the majority-opinion authors.

SCOTUSblog on camera: Decision Day (26 June 2014) Kate Starr

Kate Starr, a women’s rights activist and intern in Washington, D.C., reacts to the Supreme Court’s decision in McCullen v. Coakley, striking down a Massachusetts law establishing a thirty-five-foot “buffer zone” around reproductive health centers. (Fabrizio di Piazza)

[Please note:  Ms. Starr is an intern at the National Organization for Women. She was careful to say that the views she expresses here are her own; her views do not represent those of NOW.]

Term Snapshot
Awards