Editor's Note :

On Thursday we expect one or more opinions in argued cases. We will begin live blogging shortly before ten o'clock.

Zurn Pex, Inc. v. Cox

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-740 8th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, PC represents the respondents in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted.

Issue: When a party proffers expert testimony in support of or in opposition to a motion for class certification, may the district court rely on the testimony in ruling on the motion without conducting a full and conclusive examination of its admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and this Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ?

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents