Zurn Pex, Inc. v. CoxPetition dismissed under Rule 46 on April 11, 2013
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-740||8th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2012|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, PC represents the respondents in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted.
Issue: When a party proffers expert testimony in support of or in opposition to a motion for class certification, may the district court rely on the testimony in ruling on the motion without conducting a full and conclusive examination of its admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and this Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ?
Plain English Summary:
- Petition of the day (Kali Borkoski)