Zurn Pex, Inc. v. Cox

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-740 8th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, PC represents the respondents in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted.

Issue: When a party proffers expert testimony in support of or in opposition to a motion for class certification, may the district court rely on the testimony in ruling on the motion without conducting a full and conclusive examination of its admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and this Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ?

Plain English Summary:

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Term Snapshot