Zuress v. Donley

Petition for certiorari denied on June 27, 2011

Consolidated with:

Wetherill v. McHugh

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-374	9th Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2010

Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.

Issue: In what circumstances are dual-status technicians, who perform civilian roles within military departments, protected by federal statutes prohibiting employment discrimination?

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Kiran Bhat, October 22, 2010)

Briefs and Documents

Opinion below (9th Circuit)
Petition for certiorari
Brief in opposition
Amicus brief for the American Association for Justice and Equal Rights Advocates
Petitioner's reply
Supplemental brief for petitioner
Second supplemental brief for petitioner

Breaking News

Zuress v. Donley

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Supreme Court to hear Trump’s bid for criminal immunity

Ghost guns, six-person juries, and discretionary visa decisions

Justices divided over Jan. 6 participant’s call to throw out obstruction charge

Justices limit securities liability for omission of material facts