Breaking News

Wimbley v. Alabama

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-7939 Ala. Crim. App. Not Argued May 31, 2016 8-0 Per Curiam OT 2015

Issue: (1) Whether, under Miranda v. Arizona and Edwards v. Arizona, law enforcement officers are permitted to interrogate a defendant after he invokes his right to counsel, is placed in a jail cell that does not have adequate water and light, is held there without counsel for four days and then contacts officers to discuss the conditions of his confinement; and (2) whether this Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida invalidates a death sentence that is based on a judge's independent findings that aggravating circumstances existed and that they outweighed mitigating circumstances, rather than a jury verdict.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on May 31, 2016.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Dec 11 2015Application (15A626) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 24, 2015 to January 28, 2016, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Dec 16 2015Application (15A626) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 28, 2016.
Jan 28 2016Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2016)
Feb 9 2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 4, 2016.
Apr 4 2016Brief of respondent Alabama in opposition filed.
Apr 20 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 12, 2016.
Apr 26 2016Record Requested .
May 10 2016Record received from the Court of Criminal Appeals for the State of Alabama. The record is electronic.
May 11 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2016.
May 31 2016Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Hurst v. Florida, 577 U. S. ___ (2016).
Jul 5 2016MANDATE ISSUED
Jul 5 2016JUDGMENT ISSUED