Issue: Whether the decision by the D.C. Court of Appeals conflicts with this Court's precedent, as well as precedent in other jurisdictions, where the appellate court, in determining whether an initially lawful traffic stop became an unlawful seizure, failed to focus on whether the police diligently pursued the purpose of the traffic investigation, and instead focused merely on the time it took police to conduct an unrelated investigation.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|May 15 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 19, 2015)|
|Jun 10 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 20, 2015.|
|Jun 26 2015||Memorandum of respondent United States filed.|
|Jul 16 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Oct 5 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 9, 2015.|
|Oct 13 2015||Petition DENIED.|