United States v. Eurodif
Consolidated with:
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07-1059 | Fed. Cir. |
Nov 4, 2008 Tr. |
Jan 26, 2009 | 9-0 | Souter | OT 2008 |
Issue: Whether contracts for uranium enrichment services are subject to federal anti-dumping laws.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice David Souter on January 26, 2009.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion Recap: U.S. v. Eurodif
- Oral Argument Recap: USEC v. Eurodif and US v. Eurodif
- SCOTUSwiki Preview: USEC v. Eurodif and US v. Eurodif
- Court to hear anti-dumping, sentencing cases
Briefs and Documents
Merit briefs
- Brief for Petitioners USEC, Inc., and the United States Enrichment Corporation (in 07-1078 only)
- Brief of Petitioner United States of America
- Brief of Respondent Eurodif S.A., et al.
- Brief of Respondent Ad Hoc Utilities Group
- Reply Brief for Petitioner USEC, Inc. and the United States Enrichment Corporation(in 07-1078 only)
- Reply Brief for Petitioner United States of America(in 07-1059 only)
Amicus briefs
- Brief for the Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Alcoa, Inc., in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the National Atomic Company Kazatomprom in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Professor Raj Bhala in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Techsnabexport in Support of Respondent
Certiorari-stage documents
- Opinion below (Fed. Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (United States)
- Petition for certiorari (USEC)
- Brief in opposition (Ad Hoc Utilities Group)
- Brief in opposition (Eurodif, S.A.)
- Brief of the Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws in support of Petitioners
- Petitioner's reply (United States)
- Petitioner's reply (United States)
- Petitioner's reply (USEC)
Submit Event
