Issue: Whether the court of appeals exceeded its
authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus
when it completely disregarded and ignored
this Court’s well-established precedent of
Woodford v. Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state
court’s application of Beck v. Alabama contrary to United
States Supreme Court precedent, although
the state court expressly recognized, cited
and applied the appropriate federal standard
of review but its analysis was not a model of
clarity; and (2) whether the decision of the court of appeals
finding error under Beck based solely on
speculative and non-existent evidence is
so clearly erroneous, and in conflict with
other lower federal courts, that this Court should, if not grant plenary review, at least
grant certiorari, vacate the court of appeals’
decision, and remand with instructions
to deny habeas corpus relief.
“I’m expecting a decision that is either all or nothing. And, I expect that the Court will rule that there is a constitutional right that protects same-sex couples’ right to marry.” Kenji Yoshino, Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law and author most recently of Marriage Equality […]
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.