Ticketmaster v. StearnsPetition for certiorari denied on April 23, 2012
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-983||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2011|
Issue: (1) Whether, in federal court, all members of a putative class – not just the named plaintiff – must have Article III standing to sue; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in choosing to follow a state’s rule that only a named plaintiff need have standing to sue, regardless of the lack of standing of putative class members, thereby disregarding the requirements of Article III standing.