Stuart v. Alabama

Pending petition
Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
TBD
Opinion
TBD
Vote
TBD
Author
TBD
Term
TBD

Issue: Whether the Alabama courts’ decision to permit the introduction of written “reports” to law enforcement, regarding blood alcohol tests, into evidence for the truth of the matters asserted therein — despite the lack of testimony from the person who performed the test and signed the report, or any witness who personally involved in the testing of the blood samples in question — is contrary to Bullcoming v. New Mexico.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Jun 14 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 18, 2018)
Jul 02 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2018 to August 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 10 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 17, 2018.
Aug 08 2018Brief of respondent State of Alabama in opposition filed.
Aug 20 2018Reply of petitioner Vanessa Stuart filed. (Distributed)
Aug 22 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
Sep 18 2018Record Requested.

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY