Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

1) There is a possibility of opinions on Thursday at 10 a.m. We will begin live-blogging at 9 a.m. at this link, where readers can also sign up for an email reminder when we start the live blog.
2) We are hosting an online symposium on the Supreme Court’s opinions in partisan-gerrymandering cases Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone. Contributions to the symposium and additional coverage are available on our case page for Gill.
3) Our statistics page presents the data on each sitting – the cases (14 remain undecided) and the majority-opinion authors.

Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
08-1151 Supreme Court of Florida Dec 2, 2009
Tr.
Jun 17, 2010 8-0 Scalia OT 2009

Holding: Florida's beach restoration program deposits sand on eroded beaches, effectively creating new land at the water's edge. A state court held that the state owns the newly created strip of land at the water's edge, not the individuals who own the land abutting the new newly created beach area. The Supreme Court held that this ruling did not effectively take the landowners property without just compensation because it was consistent with pre-existing state property law.

Judgment: Affirmed, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia on June 17, 2010. Justice Kennedy wrote separately, concurring in part and in the judgment, joined by Justice Sotomayor; Justice Breyer concurred in part and in the judgment, joined by Justice Ginsburg. Justice Stevens took no part.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs

Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards