Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

The Supreme Court has removed Leidos, Inc. v. Indiana Public Retirement System, previously scheduled for oral argument on November 6, from its argument calendar.

Schimel v. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin

Petition for certiorari denied on June 28, 2016
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-1200 7th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2015

Issue: (1) Whether a regulation of abortion doctors is subject to a facial challenge under Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England and Gonzales v. Carhart, when a majority of abortion doctors have already satisfied the requirement, and where the only doctors not already in compliance failed to make diligent efforts; and (2) whether a challenge to a regulation of abortion doctors under the Due Process Clause falls within the “very limited and well-defined class of cases,” City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc., in which inquiry into the legislature’s subjective motives is permissible.

DateProceedings and Orders
Jan 26 2016Application (15A784) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 21, 2016 to March 22, 2016, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Jan 29 2016Application (15A784) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 22, 2016.
Mar 22 2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 25, 2016)
Mar 22 2016Appendix of Brad D. Schimel, Attorney General of Wisconsin, et al. filed.
Apr 14 2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 24, 2016.
May 24 2016Brief of respondents Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
Jun 7 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.
Jun 8 2016Reply of respondents Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jun 27 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 27, 2016.
Jun 28 2016Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards