Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

On Monday the Supreme Court will release orders from the June 21 conference at 9:30 a.m. and one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. We will live-blog at this link, where readers can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.
We're hosting an online symposium on October Term 2017’s separation-of-powers and administrative-law decisions. Contributions are available at this link.

Republic of the Philippines v. Pimentel

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
06-1204 9th Cir. Jan 17, 2008
Tr.Aud.
Jun 12, 2008 7-2 Kennedy OT 2007

Holding: (1) Because Arelma and the Philippine National Bank also seek review of the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, this court need not rule on the question whether the Republic of the Philippines and the commission established to recover property wrongfully taken by Ferdinand Marcos while he was president of the republic, having been dismissed from the suit, had the right to seek review of the decision that the suit could proceed in their absence. As a general matter any party may move to dismiss an action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b). Arelma and PNB have not lost standing to have the judgment vacated in its entirety on procedural grounds simply because they did not appeal, or petition for certiorari on, the underlying merits ruling denying them the interpleaded assets. (2) Rule 19 requires dismissal of the interpleader action.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy on June 12, 2008. Justice Souter joined the opinion as to all but Parts IV-B. Justice Stevens joined Part II of the opinion. Justices Stevens and Souter filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits briefs (via ABA)

Amicus briefs

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards