Pitcairn Properties, Inc. v. LJL 33rd Street Associates, LLCPetition for certiorari denied on May 19, 2014
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-879||2d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2013|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondent in this case.
Issue: Whether this Court should adopt a per se rule providing that an arbitrator commits "misconduct . . . in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy" within the meaning of Section 10(a)(3) of the Federal Arbitration Act when an arbitrator excludes the sole relevant and non-cumulative evidence in support of a fact material to the controversy, without a need for the party to show prejudice or bad faith.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|Jan 21 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2014)|
|Jan 23 2014||Waiver of right of respondent LJL 33rd Street Associates, LLC to respond filed.|
|Feb 26 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 21, 2014.|
|Mar 4 2014||Response Requested . (Due April 3, 2014)|
|Apr 2 2014||Brief of respondent LJL 33rd Street Associates, LLC in opposition filed.|
|Apr 14 2014||Reply of petitioner Pitcairn Properties, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 16 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 2, 2014.|
|Apr 29 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 15, 2014.|
|May 19 2014||Petition DENIED.|