Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week we are hosting an online symposium on NIFLA v. Becerra, in which the Supreme Court will consider whether the disclosures required by California’s Reproductive FACT Act violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment. Contributions are available at this link.

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Williams

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
07-1216 Or. S.Ct. Dec 3, 2008
Tr.
Mar 31, 2009 9-0 Per Curiam OT 2008

Issue: Whether the Supreme Court of Oregon, on remand from the Court’s 2007 decision on the constitutionality of a $79.5 million punitive damages award based on harms done to non-named plaintiffs, improperly asserted a state law procedural bar having the effect of precluding Phillip Morris from asserting a constitutional claim.

Judgment: Dismissed in a per curiam opinion on March 31, 2009.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merit briefs

Amicus briefs

Certiorari-Stage Documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards