Oregon v. Ice

Docket No.
Argument
Oct 14, 2008
Tr.
Opinion
Vote
5-4
Author
Ginsburg
Term

Issue: Whether, under Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. Washington (2004), a sentencing judge violates the Sixth Amendment by imposing consecutive sentences based on a fact not found by the jury or admitted by the defendant.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on January 14, 2009.

Briefs and Documents

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY

Merit briefs

Amicus briefs

[##CERT-STAGE##]

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY