Noriega v. Torres

Editor's Note :

Noriega v. Torres

Reconciling ceilings and floors: Alleyne v. United States – Mike Gottlieb

Opinion recap: If you want to claim the Fifth . . . – Lyle Denniston

Opinion analysis: Turns out, turnabout is fair play – Kevin Russell

Briefs and Documents

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Certiorari-stage documents

Featured Posts

Sponsored by Bloomberg Law

Search

This Week at the Court

Major Cases

Upcoming Petitions

Major Pending Petitions

Recent Decisions

Recent Special Features

Statistical Snapshot

Twitter Feed

Calendar: June 2013

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Subscriptions

Bloomberg Law and SCOTUSblog’s Supreme Court Challenge

Conference of June 20

Orders

Conference

Orders

Conference

Opinions

Orders

Conference

Opinions

Orders

Pending petition

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
11-567	9th Cir.	TBD	TBD	TBD	TBD	TBD

Issue: (1) Whether, under Brower v. County of Inyo, 489 U.S. 593 (1989), a police officer’s accidental, inadvertent use of deadly force against an arrestee can constitute an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment; and (2) whether, under Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), the standard for unreasonable force under the Fourth Amendment is identical to the standard of general negligence so that an officer may be held liable for the accidental, inadvertent use of deadly force against an arrestee; and (3) whether a police officer is entitled to qualified immunity for the accidental, inadvertent use of deadly force against an arrestee.

Opinion below (9th Cir.)
Petition for certiorari

Featured Posts

Reconciling ceilings and floors: Alleyne v. United States – Mike Gottlieb

Opinion recap: If you want to claim the Fifth . . . – Lyle Denniston

Opinion analysis: Turns out, turnabout is fair play – Kevin Russell
Sponsored by Bloomberg Law
Search

Archives

or

This Week at the Court

On Monday the Court granted four new cases and issued opinions in five cases: Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona; Salinas v. Texas; FTC v. Actavis; Alleyne v. United States; Maracich v. Spears.

We expect opinions again on Thursday at 10 a.m. We will begin live blogging around 9:00 on Thursday.
Major Cases
- Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
  Affirmative action
- Shelby County v. Holder
  Constitutionality of Section 5 of Voting Rights Act
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
  California's definition of marriage and the Equal Protection Clause
- United States v. Windsor
  Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  Natural genes are not patentable; synthetic genes are.
Upcoming Petitions
- Wilson v. Flaherty Habeas challenge to sex offender registrations
- Samantar v. Yousuf Common law immunity for foreign officials acting on behalf of foreign states
- Pruitt v. Nova Health Systems Constitutionality of state law requiring pre-abortion ultrasounds
- Lozano v. Alvarez Return of an abducted child under the Hague Convention
More Petitions »
Major Pending Petitions
- Pruitt v. Nova Health Systems
  Constitutionality of state law requiring pre-abortion ultrasounds
- Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison
  Bancrupcy court jurisdiction based on "implied consent" of litigants
- Environmental Protection Agency v. EME Homer City Generation
  States' regulation of interstate air pollution contributions under the Clean Air Act
- National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning
  Constitutionality of President's recess appointments to NRLB
- Mulhall v. Unite Here Local 355
  Rights under the Labor-Management Relations Act
Recent Decisions
- Salinas v. Texas The privilege against self-incrimination must be expressly invoked.
- Maracich v. Spears Federal law prohibits use of private driver data to solicit clients.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis “Pay for delay” lawsuits against drug manufacturers can proceed.
- Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. Arizona’s proof-of-citizenship requirement for voters is preempted by federal law.
- Alleyne v. United States Juries must find facts that increase mandatory minimum sentences.
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 75

Cases decided 61

Summary reversals 4

Merits Cases Set for Argument 75

see all »
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Full Calendar Submit Event

Orders/Opinions
Arguments
Conferences

Events
Holidays
Multiple

Videos see all

Major decisions ahead at Court

Amy Howe joins MSNBC to discuss the major cases that the Court will decide over the next few weeks.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.

Subscriptions

RSS

Twitter: Blog Staff Tweets
Follow @scotusblog

Twitter: Each Blog Post, Tweeted
Follow @scotusblogposts
Bloomberg Law and SCOTUSblog’s Supreme Court Challenge
Current Standings - Top 5 Teams

1. Goldman St Johns School of Law
     St. Johns University School of Law

2. Protect Sam Chase
     St. Johns University School of Law

3. Switch in Time Saves 9
     UCLA School of Law

4. Bro Bono
     Indiana University -Bloomington, Maurer School of Law

4. Team Katie Jo
     University of Notre Dame Law School

Click here to learn more

6
Conference

13
Conference
Opinions

20
Conference
Opinions

Cases argued	75
Cases decided	61
Summary reversals	4
Merits Cases Set for Argument	75